Sir your article SNJ 07/02/24 regarding the graffiti on the canal footpath is somewhat surprising when in a recent edition of your broad sheet, your eulogized reporting of a similar Art form is described as a mural, when daubed on the walls of a vacant property in the town.
I wonder if the owners of the said property regard this somewhat third-rate Banksy in the same light? Perhaps the Detritus of the artist and not the double standards is the clue.
For Outrage!
Francis Ray (Stroud)
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel